<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Are WPF Developers Trying to Kill Menus?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christopherestep.com/2009/10/why-are-wpf-developers-trying-to-kill-menus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christopherestep.com/2009/10/why-are-wpf-developers-trying-to-kill-menus/</link>
	<description>All things WPF, Silverlight and Windows Phone 7</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 13:45:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Schroedl</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherestep.com/2009/10/why-are-wpf-developers-trying-to-kill-menus/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>John Schroedl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherestep.com/2009/10/why-are-wpf-developers-trying-to-kill-menus/#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Gotta agree with this one. Kiosks + Touch is good (simplify for the masses). I tried the HP touch machine and after a while the touch just seemed like a gimmick. Without a killer touch desktop app it was more of a hassle. Who wants to reach up all the time.  

Perhaps a tablet PCs 2.0 could revive touch. Win7 having easier touch APIs will help. UPS/FexEx delivery man apps will be all over that.

I can see your point on Office having menus as well as the follow the mac approach. Of course on the mac you have the one-menu-to-rule-them-all.  Personally, I don&#039;t like that model (use a mac for some of my dev work) having an app running w/ no windows still uses the menu bar.

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta agree with this one. Kiosks + Touch is good (simplify for the masses). I tried the HP touch machine and after a while the touch just seemed like a gimmick. Without a killer touch desktop app it was more of a hassle. Who wants to reach up all the time.  </p>
<p>Perhaps a tablet PCs 2.0 could revive touch. Win7 having easier touch APIs will help. UPS/FexEx delivery man apps will be all over that.</p>
<p>I can see your point on Office having menus as well as the follow the mac approach. Of course on the mac you have the one-menu-to-rule-them-all.  Personally, I don&#8217;t like that model (use a mac for some of my dev work) having an app running w/ no windows still uses the menu bar.</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yogesh Jagota</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherestep.com/2009/10/why-are-wpf-developers-trying-to-kill-menus/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Yogesh Jagota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherestep.com/2009/10/why-are-wpf-developers-trying-to-kill-menus/#comment-225</guid>
		<description>Your statement...
&quot;I don’t believe that touch will ever be prominent on anything but mobile devices and consumer/kiosk application&quot;...
sounds something like these:
&quot;There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home.&quot; by Ken Olson, or,
&quot;We will never make a 32 bit operating system.&quot;, Bill Gates. 

:P

No offense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your statement&#8230;<br />
&#8220;I don’t believe that touch will ever be prominent on anything but mobile devices and consumer/kiosk application&#8221;&#8230;<br />
sounds something like these:<br />
&#8220;There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home.&#8221; by Ken Olson, or,<br />
&#8220;We will never make a 32 bit operating system.&#8221;, Bill Gates. </p>
<p> <img src='http://www.christopherestep.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>No offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Estep</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherestep.com/2009/10/why-are-wpf-developers-trying-to-kill-menus/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Estep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherestep.com/2009/10/why-are-wpf-developers-trying-to-kill-menus/#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments.

I don&#039;t believe that touch will ever be prominent on anything but mobile devices and consumer/kiosk applications.  While significant, they don&#039;t really comprise the lion&#039;s share of what&#039;s being written and I don&#039;t see that changing.

ATM&#039;s are more akin to a kiosk device and as such naturally have a completely custom interface, the same way you do with electronics on vehicles as well as consumer electronics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe that touch will ever be prominent on anything but mobile devices and consumer/kiosk applications.  While significant, they don&#8217;t really comprise the lion&#8217;s share of what&#8217;s being written and I don&#8217;t see that changing.</p>
<p>ATM&#8217;s are more akin to a kiosk device and as such naturally have a completely custom interface, the same way you do with electronics on vehicles as well as consumer electronics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yogesh Jagota</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherestep.com/2009/10/why-are-wpf-developers-trying-to-kill-menus/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Yogesh Jagota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherestep.com/2009/10/why-are-wpf-developers-trying-to-kill-menus/#comment-223</guid>
		<description>First of all, I think this article&#039;s title should read &quot;Why Are WPF Developers Trying to Kill Topbar menus?&quot;.

Secondly, I wonder you will say this after a few years too when touch will become a prominent way to interact with your system. Wonder how a top bar menus will work on a ATM?

Menus will never be dead. When you have too many options, menus is the way to go. But yes, the way a menus looks today might change. Evolution. Toolbars are nothing but menu shortcuts. Office ribbon is a combination of a toolbar and a top bar menus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I think this article&#8217;s title should read &#8220;Why Are WPF Developers Trying to Kill Topbar menus?&#8221;.</p>
<p>Secondly, I wonder you will say this after a few years too when touch will become a prominent way to interact with your system. Wonder how a top bar menus will work on a ATM?</p>
<p>Menus will never be dead. When you have too many options, menus is the way to go. But yes, the way a menus looks today might change. Evolution. Toolbars are nothing but menu shortcuts. Office ribbon is a combination of a toolbar and a top bar menus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Estep</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherestep.com/2009/10/why-are-wpf-developers-trying-to-kill-menus/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Estep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherestep.com/2009/10/why-are-wpf-developers-trying-to-kill-menus/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>I thought that at first but I started thinking hard about it and I don&#039;t think that&#039;s the case.  Office 2007 still has menus.  Vista and Windows 7 still have menus.  They&#039;re just not as prominent.  Even the ribbon panel has menus within it, but at its heart it&#039;s a toolbar.

More and more apps are eschewing even toolbars.

I don&#039;t think it&#039;s so much a &quot;follow Office&quot; as it is &quot;Apple are gods of design&quot;.  Apple tends toward over-simplification of its UI in its devices, and it&#039;s those devices that are most visible.

At least that&#039;s what I&#039;m thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that at first but I started thinking hard about it and I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s the case.  Office 2007 still has menus.  Vista and Windows 7 still have menus.  They&#8217;re just not as prominent.  Even the ribbon panel has menus within it, but at its heart it&#8217;s a toolbar.</p>
<p>More and more apps are eschewing even toolbars.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s so much a &#8220;follow Office&#8221; as it is &#8220;Apple are gods of design&#8221;.  Apple tends toward over-simplification of its UI in its devices, and it&#8217;s those devices that are most visible.</p>
<p>At least that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Schroedl</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherestep.com/2009/10/why-are-wpf-developers-trying-to-kill-menus/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>John Schroedl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherestep.com/2009/10/why-are-wpf-developers-trying-to-kill-menus/#comment-221</guid>
		<description>I blieve that it&#039;s the &quot;follow Office&quot; mentality. Office goes with a ribbon and no menu thus the lemmings follow.

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I blieve that it&#8217;s the &#8220;follow Office&#8221; mentality. Office goes with a ribbon and no menu thus the lemmings follow.</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
